Overpopulation always was and still is an uneasy topic. To put it simply, the world is simply too fragile and frankly, small to accommodate so many people. 7 Billion People are way too much. Now throw in a rebel with a brilliant mind and a narcissist personality. Add art, mysterious hidden messages and of course, the element X, conspiracy theories and we have Dan Brown’s latest thriller.
This 480 paged novel is Dan Brown’s 6th novel and 4th in his infamous Robert Langdon series (the others being “Angels & Demons”, “The Da Vinci Code” and “The Lost Symbol”). With Inferno, Dan brings back our favourite Harvard Symbolism professor to Europe; Florence, Italy to be precise.
This location is ideal for the book. Drawing from Brown’s usual style of writing, Florence is the best location for a thriller based on hidden messages in art, as it was the birthplace of the Renaissance. Housing many of the world renowned masterpieces, choosing Florence was not a mistake.
Moving on to the fine points of the book, Inferno is a well written classic Dan Brown thriller though not as controversial or conspiracy oriented in nature as his previous writings. Futuristic yes, but not quite. I won’t reveal much about the plot yet except for the fact that it is themed on a Dante obsessed eugenic expert who has bold revolutionary ideas. Apart from that, the plot is one which all Dan Brown fans are familiar with, and due to the nature of deep familiarity, comfortable with.
The downfalls of the book are in certain subtle quirks, which differ from reader to reader. Although the plot is a Dan Brown usual, it doesn’t hold up in this case. It’s really tough to buy into the fact that a single person, no matter how intelligent he is, can outrun government agencies, privately hired mercenaries and in this case, even the personnel of the United Nations.
Secondly, Brown’s style of writing has always been something that people have been critics of. The unnecessary exuberance and constant skipping of pronouns in favour of names seems irritating now and appears to be farce to make the book thicker. I agree that a conspiracy centred book should be surplus with details, but in this case, we have copious amounts of writing but yet very little detail is to be found, leaving a huge unanswered question- “Is this(over descriptive writing or as I call it, “A song of Adjectives and Adverbs”) really necessary?”
To sum it up, if you loved Dan Brown’s previous work, you’ll definitely love this one but it won’t be your favourite. Imagine a art chase like Angels and Demons, a conspiracy like The Da Vinci Code, a real time problem like The Digital Fortress and a dull end like The Lost Symbol. There you go ladies and gentlemen, I lay bare the formula of his latest thriller, Inferno.